dc.contributor.author MacDonell, Stephen Gerard
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-17T17:41:08Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-17T17:41:08Z
dc.date.copyright 1991-10
dc.date.issued 2012-05-18
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Systems and Software, vol.16(2), pp.141 - 149
dc.identifier.issn 0164-1212
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10292/4200
dc.description.abstract The lack of widespread industry acceptance of much of the research into the measurement of software complexity must be due at least in part to the lack of experimental rigor associated with many of the studies. This article examines 13 areas in which previous empirical problems have arisen, citing examples where appropriate, and provides recommendations regarding more adequate procedures.
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(91)90008-T
dc.rights Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in (see Citation). Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. The definitive version was published in (see Citation). The original publication is available at (see Publisher's Version)
dc.subject Program repair maintenance
dc.subject Metrics
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Validation
dc.subject Halstead
dc.title Rigor in software complexity measurement experimentation
dc.type Journal Article
dc.rights.accessrights OpenAccess
dark.contributor.author MacDonell, S
aut.relation.endpage 149
aut.relation.issue 2
aut.relation.startpage 141
aut.relation.volume 16

Search Scholarly Commons


Advanced Search

Browse

Theses and Dissertations

About Scholarly Commons

Usage Statistics

Share

  • Bookmark and Share